Digital asset and risk map
We create a monitoring inventory for brand names, product families, domains, official accounts and authorised sales channels. We define search rules for spelling variations and similarities together.
Protect your brand’s value at every touchpoint in the digital world.
From fake accounts to suspicious product listings, from brand imitation to digital reputation risks, we turn scattered signals into a prioritised action plan.
Select your priority need. See the review scope and information needed initially; this selection is not an automated infringement assessment.
Listing images, descriptions, product models and sales channel information are compared.
Similarity is a signal for review; the product is not automatically considered counterfeit.
The scope, format and delivery conditions of included records and reports are defined in the proposal. A review record may include the following fields.
A review file alone does not guarantee the adequacy of legal evidence or the outcome of an application.
Official accounts, domains and authorised seller lists are compared with information supplied and confirmed as current by the organisation. A source’s absence from the list alone does not mean it is unauthorised or fake.
Legitimate criticism, fan accounts, authorised seller use and licensed images are examined separately from suspected imitation or deception. Removal of negative opinions is not the aim.
Rights ownership, usage permission and application suitability are clarified with authorised teams; this page does not produce a legal decision.
Brand Protection & Monitoring · Suspected counterfeit product
This form currently prepares a preview only. Your information is not sent to a server or saved. Submission and application tracking will become available when the admin panel is completed.
For direct contact and official application channels, you can review the company information .
This area is for a scope discussion; it does not replace content removal or a legal application.
How can suspicious product listings and accounts be tracked in a single review queue with source, review status and responsible team information?
Select a record heading to open its image, checklist and next step.

Illustrative image; not an actual listing, account or domain finding.
Checking a listing flagged for image similarity against authorised product and sales channel information.
Product and channel verification is requested from the brand team. An appropriate application is prepared only after assessment by the authorised team.
Image or price similarity alone does not establish that a product is counterfeit.
Illustrative image; not an actual listing, account or domain finding.
Comparing an account with a similar name, profile image and redirects against the official account inventory.
Official account and authorisation information are checked by the organisation. If there is potential deception, the notification file is submitted to the authorised team for approval.
A similar name, legitimate criticism or fan account alone is not a rights infringement.
Illustrative image; not an actual listing, account or domain finding.
Examining content on a similar domain, claimed organisational affiliation and redirect behaviour in context.
Source and observation records are assessed. Legal characterisation and the application route are determined with the authorised legal team.
Spelling similarity alone is not proof of bad faith or infringement.
Record the URL, time and context.
Compare with the inventory and state uncertainty.
Determine the next step with the authorised team.
For a growing brand, the issue is not simply seeing where its name appears. It is necessary to identify which findings affect consumer trust, which incidents require review and which team will take responsibility. We build the brand protection programme around your product portfolio, sales channels and internal decision-making processes.
We create a monitoring inventory for brand names, product families, domains, official accounts and authorised sales channels. We define search rules for spelling variations and similarities together.
We examine product, seller and listing signals from publicly accessible or authorised sources. We add suspicious image, price, description and channel patterns to the review queue; we do not treat a signal alone as proof of infringement.
We assess accounts imitating the brand, similar domains and accessible advertisement examples. We record the source and context of findings that may mislead users.
We merge duplicate records and classify findings by potential impact, reach and urgency. By checking the accuracy of automated matches, we help teams focus on the incidents that truly matter.
We prepare traceable records with URLs, observation dates, screenshots and review notes. We coordinate with your legal or trademark representative team on platform notifications and application files.
We consider complaints arising from counterfeit sales, customer communications and search visibility in the same context. We feed brand protection findings into Digital PR and social listening work.
The deliverables below that are included in your project are specified in the written proposal, with quantities, formats, delivery dates and acceptance conditions. Licences, hosting and maintenance are shown separately if not included.
An initial document showing brands, countries, languages, sources, review frequencies and exclusions.
An incident list with a defined source, review status, owner and next step.
Notification documents submitted for your organisation’s approval and tracking of application status.
Reporting that brings together recurring risks, channel distribution, open tasks and proposed measures.
We clarify the brand portfolio, priority markets and team responsibilities during the discovery meeting.
We review findings within a sample scope and calibrate search rules and false matches.
For verified findings, we operate the approval, notification and handover process to the legal team.
We improve the monitoring plan by assessing open incidents, recurrences and channel changes.
Example use cases for which we can define the scope together.
Tracking findings for different brands and product families in a common reporting structure with separate responsibilities.
Connecting seller and product signals to operational review by the ecommerce team.
Assessing a brand protection incident together with its effects on customer experience and reputation.
We define the starting position and goals together. The indicators below are selected according to the nature of the work.
Source access, data licences, countries, languages and notification permissions are clarified at the start of the project. The legal evidentiary status of records and the suitability of applications are assessed with the authorised legal team.
No. Legitimate criticism, customer complaints and potential rights infringements are assessed separately. The aim is not to suppress negative opinions, but to identify imitation and misleading practices and determine the appropriate action.
We cannot guarantee decisions by a platform or competent authority. We review findings and work with your authorised team on application preparation and process tracking. Legal characterisation and the adequacy of evidence are assessed by your legal team.
A continuous or periodic plan is established according to source access, data licences, country, language and risk level. Alert thresholds and response times are agreed at the proposal stage.
Yes; we initially assess access options and operational capacity for each country, language and source. After validating the pilot scope, we expand the programme gradually.
Brand Protection & Monitoring — Let’s assess your needs, priorities and current setup together.
Get in touch for a discovery meeting ↗